Автор работы: Пользователь скрыл имя, 12 Ноября 2011 в 13:46, реферат
In the silent era of film, marrying the image with synchronous sound was not possible for inventors and producers, since no practical method was devised until 1923. Thus, for the first thirty years of their history, films were silent, although accompanied by live musicians and sometimes sound effects and even commentary spoken by the showman or projectionist.
[edit]
Insert Shots
Insert shot in Old Wives for New (Cecil
B. DeMille, 1918)
The use of Insert Shots, i.e. Close Ups of objects other than faces, was established very early, but apart from the special case of Inserts of a letter that was being read by one of the characters, they were infrequently used before 1914. It is really only with his *The Avenging Conscience*of 1914 that a new phase in the use of the Insert Shot starts. As well as the symbolic inserts already mentioned, The Avenging Conscience also made extensive use of large numbers of Big Close Up shots of clutching hands and tapping feet as a means of emphasizing those parts of the body as indicators of psychological tension. Griffith never went so far in this direction again, but his use of the Insert made its real impression on other American film-makers during the years 1914-1919. Cecil B. DeMille was a leading figure in the increased use of the Insert, and by 1918 he had reached the point of including about 9 Inserts in every 100 shots in The Whispering Chorus. He also pushed the insert into areas of visual sensuality inaccessible to D.W. Griffith, with such images as a Close Up of a silver-plated revolver nestling in a pile of silken sexy ribbons in a drawer in Old Wives for New (1918).
[edit]
The atmospheric insert
Like many other devices that were more fully developed in Europe during the next decade, what could be called the “atmospheric Insert Shot” made its first appearance in American films during the years before 1919. This kind of shot is one in a scene which neither contains any of the characters in the story, nor is a Point of View shot seen by one of them. An early example is in Maurice Tourneur's The Pride of the Clan (1917), in which there is a series of shots of waves beating on a rocky shore which are shown when the locale of the story, which is about the harsh lives of fisher folk, is being introduced. Simpler and cruder examples from the same year occurs in William S. Hart'sThe Narrow Trail, in which a single shot of the mouth of San Francisco Bay taken against the light (the Golden Gate) is preceded by a narrative title explaining its symbolic function in the story. This film also contains a shot of wild hills and valleys cut in as one character comments that the country far from the city is so clean and pure. By 1918 we can find a shot of the sky being used to reflect the mood of one of the characters without specific explanation in The Gun Woman (Frank Borzage), but it must be emphasized that these examples are very rare, and did not either then, or within the next several years, constitute regular practice in the American cinema. The Tourneur example just mentioned also could stand as part of the beginning of the “montage sequence”. Maurice Elvey's Nelson - England's Immortal Naval Hero (1919) has a symbolic sequence dissolving from a picture of Kaiser Wilhelm II to a peacock, and then to a battleship. The atmospheric Insert began its notable career in European art cinema in Marcel L'Herbier'sRose-France. Here amongst the intentionally “poetic” uses of vignettes and filters and literary intertitles, a shot of the empty path once trod by the lovers is used to evoke the past.
[edit]
Continuity cinema
The years 1914-1919 in America also
saw the consolidation of the forms of what was to become the dominant
mode of commercial cinema: “continuity cinema”, or “classical
cinema”. During this period there were other styles that were still
important, and these can be considered to lie along a spectrum between
the best examples of “continuity cinema” at one extreme, and at
the other extreme the “DIS-continuity cinema” of D.W. Griffith.
There are a number of factors involved in the strong and apparent visual
discontinuities between successive shots in Griffith's films, and the
use of cross-cutting between parallel actions is only the most obvious
of these. In 1915, cuts within the duration of a scene were still relatively
infrequent in his films, and when they do occur they were frequently
from Long Shot or Medium Long Shot (which were the shots he most used)
to a Big Close Up of an insert detail, which only occupied a small part
of the frame in the previous shot. This in itself introduces a fairly
strong visual discontinuity across the cut, but as well as that, the
cut-in shot might often have a circular vignette mask if it were a Close
Up of a person, so reinforcing the effect. And sometimes the now-standard
Griffith iris-out and iris-in might also be left on the inserted shot,
even though it had action continuity with the shots on either side of
it. As well as all this there was Griffith's habit of moving the action
into another shot in an adjoining space, and then back again if it was
at all possible, which produced a marked change in background, which
also made its small contribution to the discontinuity between shots.
One of the advanced continuity techniques involves the exact way the movement of actors from a shot in one location to another in a neighbouring location is handled. At best this kind of transition had previously been dealt with by having the directions of travel of the actor in the two shots correspond on the screen, but in a film such as The Bank Burglar's Fate (Jack Adolfi, 1914), one can see shot transitions in which a cut is made from an actor just leaving the frame, to a shot of him well inside the frame in an adjoining location, which have the positions and directions so well chosen that to the casual eye his movement appears quite continuous, and the real space and time ellipsis between the shots is concealed. Other good examples of this technique for eliminating several yards of waste space and a few seconds of waste time can be seen in Ralph Ince's films, particularly The Right Girl (1915), and by 1919 it was widely diffused in American films, but not in those made in Europe. All this connects with the rise of the use of cutting to different angles within a scene during the years 1914-1919, and in particular to the development of reverse-angle cutting.
[edit]
Reverse-angle cutting
Cutting to different angles within
a scene now became well-established as a technique for dissecting a
scene into shots in American films. This approach had appeared a few
times in earlier years, but in general cuts to or from a closer shot
within a scene were still being made more or less down the lens axis
as established in the Long Shot of the scene in question. The particular
form of cutting to different angles within a scene in which the direction
changes by more than ninety degrees is called reverse-angle cutting
by film-makers. The leading figure in the full development of reverse-angle
cutting was Ralph Ince. Films that he made at Vitagraph in 1915 such
as The Right Girl and His Phantom Sweetheart have a large number of
reverse-angle cuts in interior, as well as exterior, scenes. Other directors
were also just starting to take up this style in 1915, for instance
William S. Hart in Bad Buck of Santa Ynez.
As for Griffith, in Birth of a Nation
there are just eight cuts to reverse-angle shots in the scene in Ford's
Theatre, while elsewhere throughout the two-and-a-half hour length of
this film there are only four more true reverse-angle cuts. Nevertheless,
the Griffith style of film-making was still followed in its full idiosyncrasy,
with extensive use of side by side spaces and a definite “front”
for the camera, in most slapstick comedy. Directors of dramatic films
who had worked Griffith also followed his style fairly closely, and
it the standard for films made by his Fine Arts section of the Triangle
company.
By 1916 there are a number of films in which there are around 15 to 20 true reverse-angle cuts per hundred shot transitions, such as The Deserter (Scott Sidney) and Going Straight. By the end of the war such films formed an appreciable but minor part of production: e.g. The Gun Woman (F. Borzage, 1918) and Jubilo (Clarence Badger, 1919). All this hardly concerned European cinema, where those few reverse-angle cuts used were mostly between a watcher and what he sees from his Point of View, both being filmed in a fairly distant shot. However, after the end of the war some of the brighter young directors such as Lubitsch started using a few reverse-angle cuts, mostly in association with Point of View cutting.
[edit]
The flash-back
The use of flash-back structures continued
to develop in this period, and the usual way of entering and leaving
a flash-back was through a dissolve, and this was in fact the principal
use at this time for this device. The Vitagraph company's The Man That
Might Have Been (William Humphrey, 1914), is even more complex, with
a series of reveries and flash-backs that contrast the protagonist's
real passage through life with what might have been, if his son had
not died. In this film dissolves are used both to enter and leave the
flash-backs, and also the wish-dreams, and also for a time-lapse inside
a reverie at one point. But fades are also used for these purposes in
this and other films of the period, and flashback transitions are also
done with irising in other films, and even straight cuts. During World
War I the use of flashbacks occurred in films from all the major European
film-making countries as well, from Italy (Tigre reale) to Denmark (Evangeliemandens
Liv) to Russia (Grezy and Posle smerti), where it arrived in 1915.
As the years moved on a sudden decline in the use of long flash-back sequences set in around 1917, but on the other hand the use of a transition to and from a brief single shot memory scene remained quite common in American films. However, there could still be an even more complex flash-back construction in American films in the case of W.S. Van Dyke'sThe Lady of the Dugout (1918). This film has a story that happened long before which is narrated by one character in the framing scene, and initially accompanied by his narrating dialogue in intertitles, though after a while this stops, and the intertitles then convey the dialogue occurring within the flashback. Inside this main flashback there develops cross-cutting to another story, happening at the same time, and at first apparently unconnected with it, though the connection eventually appears. Next, inside this first flashback, the Lady of the title narrates another story, presented in flashback form, but with cutaways inside it back to events occurring in the time frame in which she is doing her narrating. Actually, all this is fairly easy to follow while watching the film, in part because what happens in all these strings of action is relatively simple.
[edit]
Cross-cutting between parallel actions
After 1914 cross cutting between parallel
actions came to be used whenever appropriate in American films, though
this was not the case in European films. It should be noted that a good
deal of the American use of cross-cutting was not the rapid alternation
between parallel chains of action developed by D.W. Griffith, but a
limited number of alternations to make it possible to leave out uninteresting
bits of action with no real plot function. In Europe, some of the most
enterprising directors did use cross-cutting sometimes, but they never
attained the speed of the many American examples of this technique.
Cross-cutting was also used to get new effects of contrast, such as the cross-cut sequence in Cecil B. DeMille's The Whispering Chorus, in which a supposedly dead husband is having a liaison with a Chinese prostitute in an opium den, while simultaneously his unknowing wife is being remarried in church. All this was simple compared to D.W. Griffith's Intolerance (1916), in which four parallel stories are intercut throughout the whole length of the film, though in this case the stories are more similar than contrasting in their nature. The use of cross-cutting within these parallel stories as well as between them produced a complexity that was beyond the comprehension of the average audience of the time. The influence of Intolerance produced a few other films that combined a number of similar stories having similar themes, such as Maurice Tourneur's Woman (1918), but the box-office failure of Intolerance ensured that these later films had simpler structures.
[edit]
The development of film art
The general trend in the development
of cinema, led from the United States, was towards using the newly developed
specifically filmic devices for expression of the narrative content
of film stories, and combining this with the standard dramatic structures
already in use in commercial theatre. D.W. Griffith had the highest
standing amongst American directors in the industry, basically because
of the dramatic excitement he got into his films. But there were others
who were also considered as major figures at the time. The first of
these was Cecil B. DeMille, whose films, such as The Cheat (1915), brought
out the moral dilemmas facing their characters in a more subtle way
than Griffith. DeMille was also in closer touch with the reality of
contemporary American life. Maurice Tourneur was also highly ranked
for the pictorial beauties of his films, together with the subtlety
of his handling of fantasy, while at the same time he was capable of
getting greater naturalism from his actors at appropriate moments, as
in A Girl's Folly (1917). Sidney Drew was the leader in developing “polite
comedy”, while slapstick was refined by Fatty Arbuckle and Charles
Chaplin, who both started with Mack Sennet's Keystone company. They
reduced the usual frenetic pace of Sennett's films to give the audience
a chance to appreciate the subtlety and finesse of their movement, and
the cleverness of their gags. By 1917 Chaplin was also introducing more
dramatic plot into his films, and mixing the comedy with sentiment.
In Russia, Yevgeni Bauer put a slow
intensity of acting combined with Symbolist overtones onto film in a
unique way.
In Sweden, Victor Sjöström made a
series of films that combined the realities of people's lives with their
surroundings in a striking manner, while Mauritz Stiller developed sophisticated
comedy to a new level.
In Germany, Ernst Lubitsch got his inspiration from the stage work of Max Reinhardt, both in bourgeois comedy and in spectacle, and applied this to his films, culminating in his die Puppe (The Doll), die Austernprinzessin (The Oyster Princess) and Madame Dubarry.
[edit]
Hollywood triumphant
Until this point, the cinemas of France
and Italy had been the most globally popular and powerful. But the United
States was already gaining quickly when World War I (1914–1918) caused
a devastating interruption in the European film industries. The American
industry, or "Hollywood", as it was becoming known after its
new geographical center in California, gained the position it has held,
more or less, ever since: film factory for the world, exporting its
product to most countries on earth and controlling the market in many
of them.
By the 1920s, the U.S. reached what
is still its era of greatest-ever output, producing an average of 800
feature films annually,[9] or 82% of the global total (Eyman, 1997).
The comedies of Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton, the swashbuckling
adventures of Douglas Fairbanks and the romances of Clara Bow, to cite
just a few examples, made these performers’ faces well-known on every
continent. The Western visual norm that would become classical continuity
editing was developed and exported - although its adoption was slower
in some non-Western countries without strong realist traditions in art
and drama, such as Japan.
This development was contemporary with the growth of the studio system and its greatest publicity method, the star system, which characterized American film for decades to come and provided models for other film industries. The studios’ efficient, top-down control over all stages of their product enabled a new and ever-growing level of lavish production and technical sophistication. At the same time, the system's commercial regimentation and focus on glamorous escapism discouraged daring and ambition beyond a certain degree, a prime example being the brief but still legendary directing career of the iconoclastic Erich von Stroheim in the late teens and the ‘20s.