Автор работы: Пользователь скрыл имя, 05 Мая 2013 в 17:05, сочинение
This review is intended to indicate general structure and style; it is not presented as an
ideal / model answer. The review would benefit from a thorough proof-read and I might reconsider the
balance of words allocated to each section, for example I think I could deal with my methodological
criticisms more succinctly. If revising this review I would probably make more of an effort to find some
positive aspects of Barrett and Mayson’s study in order to give my view some balance. Please don’t
forget that critical review in this context means to study the paper in detail and to think carefully about
what you’re reading (good and bad). You are not being asked to attack the paper you have read!
Finally, I’ve used headings here to indicate structure. You must address each section required in the
handbook but please don’t use headings in your submitted work.